President Trump’s running mate, Senator J.D. Vance (R-OH), sat down this week for an interview with the far-left New York Times and proved once again why selecting him was one of the best decisions Trump ever made.
The paper released footage of the interview on Friday, and what followed was yet another mastery of the failing corporate media by Vance. While the discussion was ostensibly about the current presidential campaign, ‘reporter’ Lulu Garcia-Navarro determined to force Vance to answer whether Trump ”lost’ the 2020 presidential election to create chaos within the Trump campaign and fracture Vance’s relationship with the 45th president.
As TGP readers know, Tampon Tim Walz and the leftist moderators, toward the end of the VP debate, demanded Vance answer whether Trump ‘lost’ the 2020 election. He refused, causing Walz to lose it.
But rather than play Garcia-Navarro’s game, Vance expertly turned the tables on her.
He instead went straight to the most obvious fraud of the 2020 election, the deliberate big tech censorship of unfavorable to the Biden campaign, especially the Hunter Biden laptop. As Vance pointed out, censoring the groundbreaking, 100% truthful New York Post story almost certainly cost Trump millions of votes.
Garcia-Navarro repeated her stupid question like a robot several more times before Vance finally shut her up brilliantly. He made clear she was repeating a slogan while he was focused on a critical problem that still haunts Americans.
This censorship media complex not only helped Biden ‘win’ the 2020 election but also led to Harris’s rise as a political figure. Now, America is paying the price.
HOLY SH*T 🚨 Vance Shuts Down this New York Times Reporter about her 2020 Election Question
Donald Trump won the 2020 Election and anyone with a brain knows that. Great Job JD Vance
THIS is how you handle FAKE NEWS 👏 pic.twitter.com/f72ko2AkIr
— Marjorie Taylor Greene Press Release (Parody) (@MTGrepp) October 11, 2024
Conceding defeat, Garcia-Navarro next asked Vance whether he would have certified the 2020 election. Vance said no, citing the concerns he had just raised while she was trying to ambush him.
Her final question was whether Vance would commit to a peaceful transfer of power. Vance said yes, but made clear that politicians have the right to protest if they see problems with the results.
When Republicans speak with clarity like Vance and have the facts on their side, the corporate media is no match for them. The rest of the GOP should study Vance’s interviews carefully because far too many continue to fall for noticeable traps set by these left-wing propagandists.
