Counter terrorism police are now investigating an electrical substation fire that has shut London Heathrow Airport for the whole of today amid claims it could be a Russian sabotage attack linked to Vladimir Putin‘s campaign of disruption.
More than 1,300 flights to and from the UK’s busiest airport will be impacted today due to its closure following a fire at the nearby North Hyde electrical substation.
Thousands of homes were left without power with more than 100 people evacuated after a transformer at the substation caught fire as a huge explosion was heard.
Western officials have accused Russia and its proxies of staging dozens of attacks and other incidents across Europe since the invasion of Ukraine three years ago.
They allege that the disruption campaign is an extension of President Putin’s war, intended to sow division in European societies and undermine support for Ukraine – although the Kremlin has denied carrying out sabotage efforts against the West.
Earlier this week, Putin had agreed to a limited ceasefire that stops Russia targeting Ukraine’s energy infrastructure after a phone call with US President Donald Trump.
Now, experts are analysing whether Russia could be linked to the UK substation fire, which is affecting 679 flights scheduled to land and 678 departures from Heathrow.
Counter terrorism police will be involved in the investigation given the need to quickly establish whether sabotage was involved and the pressing security questions relating to how a single fire took down a major piece of infrastructure, reported The Times.
It comes after Russian spies sent a package of electric sex toys to western Europe before concealing incendiary devices ignited in UK and German DHL depots last July in what was alleged to have been a test run for a potential US-bound flight attack.
Reacting to the Heathrow fire today, security expert Will Geddes, director and founder of the International Corporate Protection Group, told MailOnline: ‘Heathrow has been looking at expanding – this isn’t a great advert for their ability to do so safely.
‘If I was a foreign hostile party and I wanted to disrupt one of the busiest airports in the world, cause international embarrassment, create many, many question marks, I would target something like a substation.
‘The Russians are looking at everything. They’re looking at our fibre optics under the sea, they’re looking at our nuclear power stations, we know hostile reconnaissance is going on right now.
‘So for this to be taken down so easily and cause such an impact, one has got to say if I was Russia, that’s where I would focus my attentions as well.’
He said the incident had the potential to be a similar act of sabotage to the fires on railway tracks in France ahead of the Paris Olympics in July.
Mr Geddes continued: ‘If anybody did this it would either be down to some serious reconnaissance in advance to determine that this was a massive vulnerability.
‘They would have had to determine what leaning and what depth of responsibility and sort of impact would this substation have not only obviously on the local homes, but also on Heathrow Airport itself.
‘Or you’ve got the easier, simpler answer that these guys have fallen asleep and they have not battle readied this substation for any type of eventuality of potential power outs, fires or anything like that.
‘Where is the fire suppression system, why has that not worked? Is that because it’s faulty or because it has been tampered with?’
He said Russia and other hostile states would be glad to see the chaos it has caused ‘and it’s not outside the scope of a foreign hostile state to attack a substation or a power or utility supply to a key site.’
Bob Seely, a Russia expert and former Conservative MP, told MailOnline that the chaos at Heathrow was at least a ‘warning’ about the threat of sabotage.
He said: ‘This has exposed a massive security vulnerability. If a substation fire can shut down one of the world’s largest airports and Britain’s busiest airport, it shows a dangerous lack of resilience.
‘We should be building resilience into our critical national infrastructure, especially given the rise in Russian sabotage operations in Europe as well as the threat of home-grown terrorism or extremist protests designed to bring modern life to a halt.’
Dr Seely, whose new book ‘New Total War’ is out this summer, added: ‘Until we see different, this was very likely to have been an accident, but it is also a warning to us.
‘We need to design in and build in greater resilience in our critical national infrastructure.’
Sky News security and defence editor Deborah Haynes said: ‘Folk who track Russia’s campaign of unconventional warfare in Europe will likely wake up wondering if the fire that cut power to Heathrow was an accident or something sinister.
‘Understanding how or why the fire at a substation started will of course be key. Either way… this does really rather highlight the vulnerability of a piece of national infrastructure as critical as our largest and most important civilian airport.’
And Professor Lucy Easthope, an adviser on disaster response and recovery, and author of ‘When the Dust Settles’, added: ‘It actually does not matter whether it was a Bic lighter and pile of newspapers or a deliberate attack.
‘Either shows up the current vulnerability of national infrastructure, civil defence – I use that term deliberately – and the resourcing of response and readiness.’
It comes after Richard Gaisford, chief correspondent for ITV’s Good Morning Britain, said: ‘Heathrow Airport is a key piece of UK national infrastructure.
