The following is from two pages in the newly release FISA abuse documents from June-August of 2016..
CHS: “Well I mean I think the information about Hillary’s health and, um, ah…I don’t know how they, how they worked out the leaks from the Democratic National Committee, that must have come from somewhere.”
CT: “One of the staffers apparently and this was [UI] major news REDACTED and not on these conspiratorial, you know, websites. It was on Kennedy, Fox News, and CNN picked it up that one of his REDACTED at REDACTED was actually a REDACTED.
CHS: Oh.
CT: And REDACTED was transferring information somehow and REDACTED was on REDACTED way then to release other information and REDACTED was, certainly was REDACTED.
CHS: You’re Kidding?
CT: REDACTED [UI]
The conversation continues…
CHS: You’re Kidding?
CT: And the, and Assange [PH] on national TV alluded REDACTED. It just doesn’t happen like that. And so Assange came out…if you just Google it you’ll so…so Assange REDACTED. He was basically saying REDACTED and that the conspiracy about the Clinton team and, you know, you know the stories. So…
CHS: Chalk up another one for the Clintons.
CT: Yeah. So, ah, Assange, ah, no one knows what he’s going to release. He has said that he has information on Trump and he’ll release that too.
CHS: I’m sure he will. Yeah.
CT: And, ah, you know this could be a ploy to basically dismantle to undercut the president, next president of the United States regardless of who it’s going to be.
CHS: By showing that he got in illegitimately. Well I mean if-if the objective, if the objective is to… you know, if the objective is to destabilize the electoral process this is a way of doing it.
CT: I think that’s what it is more so than trying to like serve the election to Trump.
CHS: Right.
CT: And I’m expecting something to come out too on our… I wouldn’t be surprised.
CHS: You’re expecting [Speaking to someone else] Hi there.
CT: [UI] Orders something in Spanish…
