Arizona state senator Michelle Urgenti-Rita was booed off the stage during Turning Point’s Rally to Protect Our Elections on Saturday.
Big League Politics reported on how Turning Point invited Urgenti-Rita to the conference despite the fact that she had recently killed a crucial election reform bill in the state senate. She is currently running for secretary of state.
“Why don’t you listen to what I have to say?” Urgenti-Rita asked as the crowd turned on her, booing so loud that her voice was practically inaudible.
The crowd refused to issue sympathy to this brazen RINO, and she eventually showed her true colors and became contentious with the audience.
“It’s we the people who are empowered by our founding… Listen, I…I am running to be your next secretary of state. I am going to win the primary. Thank you very much,” she said arrogantly as the crowd refused to let her spew her empty platitudes.
The clip can be seen here:
PHOENIX AZ: @MichelleUgenti booed off stage the moment she walked out at The Turning Point Action Election integrity event with President Donald J Trump
Brutal pic.twitter.com/KJKJO9CKv7
— Drew Hernandez (@DrewHLive) July 24, 2021
Urgenti-Rita is running for secretary of state against state representative Mark Finchem, who has been a major proponent of the forensic audit. He appeared on BLP Live earlier this year to explain his comprehensive plan for reforming elections:
“Arizona state Representative Mark Finchem (R-Oro Valley) is running for secretary of state, and he recently shared his thoughts on how he could reform the election process in that position and in a state suffering a crisis of confidence in elections.
“There are a couple things we have on the radar. One of those is a ballot fraud security countermeasures process that would put a UV-light activated watermark onto ballots. In doing that, we are able to serialize the sheets of paper so that we know what is the defined universe of ballots that are in the system, of ballots that have been issued that are available,” Finchem told Big League Politics Live.
“If we are able to put a watermark and a serialization onto the paper, that means we can account for the number of ballots. Now, of course, that would not be tied to the voters so we would still have an anonymous voting system,” he added.