Sen. Rand Paul once again took aim at Dr. Anthony Fauci after a Freedom of Information Act request led to the release of thousands of pages of the doctor’s emails from the early days of the pandemic.
“Told you,” Paul posted on Twitter, along with the hashtag “#FireFauci.” “Can’t wait to see the media try to spin the Fauci FOIA emails.”
Can’t wait to see the media try to spin the Fauci FOIA emails.
— Rand Paul (@RandPaul) June 2, 2021
Paul’s comments come after more than 3,200 pages of Fauci’s emails were obtained by Buzzfeed in a Freedom of Information Act request and posted online Tuesday.
The emails shed light on what the nation’s top infectious disease expert was thinking during the early days of the pandemic, including an exchange that showed Fauci remained skeptical of the efficacy of face masks in February of last year.
FAUCI ADMITS HE WORE MASK FOR OPTICS: ‘DIDN’T WANT TO LOOK LIKE I WAS GIVING MIXED SIGNALS’
“Masks are really for infected people to prevent them from spreading infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection,” Fauci wrote in response to one person who was concerned about the use of masks on her upcoming trip.
“The typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through material. It might, however, provide some slight benefit in keep out gross droplets if someone coughs or sneezes on you,” Fauci continued. “I do not recommend that you wear a mask, particularly since you are going to a very low risk location.”
Fauci was also warned by Director of the Scripps Research Institute Kristian Andersen that COVID-19’s “unusual features” could make the virus “(potentially) look engineered.”
“We have a good team lined up to look very critically at this, so we should know much more at the end of the weekend,” Andersen wrote to Fauci as part of a chain of emails.
“I should mention that after discussions earlier today, Eddie, Bob, Mike, and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory,” Andersen said. “But we have to look at this much more closely and there are still further analyses to be done, so those opinions could still change.”
Andersen’s team eventually published a peer-reviewed paper that concluded it believes “that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible” but noted further research into the issue “could swing the balance of evidence to favor one hypothesis over another.”
Paul’s often heated exchanges with Fauci have become a common occurrence throughout the pandemic, with Paul often questioning Fauci on his seemingly inconsistent opinions on masks and the origin of COVID-19. He has also previously called for his firing, saying, “Fauci should go.”
Fauci has downplayed the Kentucky Republican’s concerns, noting that he bases his opinions on scientific literature that is continuously changing.